Inflation is modeled by the dynamics of a scalar field. One then introduces perturbations in the scalar field. One then quantizes the perturbations in terms of quantum fields. One can then calculate the two-point function of these field variables. And one can then extract the “Power spectrum” from this 2-pt function. And…. eventually this produces a description of the CMB that can be compared, very favorably, with observations.
All posts by beyondspacetimeblogging
live blogging: Sudarsky
Inflationary basics: Takes the universe from a relatively generic state after the Planck era to a state with the seeds of cosmic structure (which we then observe as the CMB, as modeled by the beach ball).
live blogging: Sudarsky
Daniel’s topic: the emergence of the seeds of structure from quantum fluctuations during the inflationary cosmological era.
This is a situation in which GR, QM, and observation come together (witness the beach ball!).
live blogging: Sudarsky
Recap of the measurement problem: 2 different types of evolution (Penrose’s U Process and R Process). Why not take Penrose’s suggestion and try to address the measurement problem by incorporating some aspect of gravity?
Live blogging: Daniel Sudarsky
Daniel thinks philosophers can contribute! (He even has a beach ball prop.)
live blogging: Mattingly
Discussion:
Audience: Philosophers can explain what “beauty” in a final theory could be like.
James: Really good art historians become physicists, not philosophers.
Audience: Conceptual work can be contributed by philosophers.
James: But who can do it when it’s coupled technically with the physics?
live blogging: Mattingly
James is unclear what the role for philosophers is here. There are good philosophers, and there are good physicists, but are there good philosopher-physicists out there?
live blogging: Mattingly
limitations of the method:
– no guarantees
– progress is slow
– problems of interpretation
live blogging: Mattingly
Two other approaches: hydrodynamic and condensed matter.
James: Intriguing ideas but not well-developed as yet.
Virtues of general method:
– it’s a *method* and not speculative ontology.
– it holds promise of making contact with other approaches
– self-correcting
– it’s worked in the past
live blogging: Mattingly
Basic tenets of stochastic gravity:
– assume a complete micro theory incorporating gravity
– assume it’s a quantum system
It must be open. (And a couple other characteristics that flew by me…)
One direction is “kinetic theory”…