Live blogging: Dittric

Dittrich discusses the “naive” solution of relational observables.

Spatial positions together with time co-ordinates are observables, as in:

“Position of particle at 5pm” is an observable.

But this is problematic:

a) In QG we do pre- or postdictions, seemingly incompatible

b) What are good clocks?

live blogging: Sudarsky

Discussion.

Audience:  Can you say a bit more about fine-tuning?

Daniel:  The technique has been applied to a very simple model.  We haven’t yet considered more complex models.

Audience:  Question about the Bunch-Davies vacuum.  Can you use other vacuum states?

Daniel:  Yes, but that doesn’t change the fundamental question:  How do you break the initial symmetry?

live blogging: Sudarsky

The quantity of interest (that is zero without CSL, but non-zero with CSL) is a result of a random walk on the complex plane…  One can now calculate this quantity and compare it with the CMB data, and this, it turns out, let’s us calculate CSL predictions (like the collapse rate parameter).

live blogging: Sudarsky

In the SCG Einstein equation, the zero mode is responsible for the inflationary expansion, and the non-zero modes are responsible for the emergence of structure.

At the early stages of inflation, the scalar field’s vacuum state is homogeneous and isotropic (the Bunch-Davies vacuum).  Now apply to this, the CSL theory (a particular dynamical collapse theory).  The random collapses that result are then responsible for the emergence of structure out of initial homogeneity/isotropy.